{"id":6355,"date":"2008-09-04T17:00:47","date_gmt":"2008-09-05T00:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=6355"},"modified":"2008-09-06T14:06:28","modified_gmt":"2008-09-06T21:06:28","slug":"daily-voting-news-for-september-04-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=6355","title":{"rendered":"‘Daily Voting News’ For September 04, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"

Readers will recall that as of yesterday<\/a> Palm Beach Co Florida officials had lost well over 3,000 ballots sometime between the primary election and an election recount. Earlier today there were announcements that over 2700 ballots had been found. Late this afternoon the officials were supposed to meet to announce whether they had found all of the missing ballots and why those ballots went missing in the first place.<\/p>\n

Were the ballots run through the high-speed optical scan machines during the recount and did the machines pick-up two or more ballots at a time thus not counting all of the ballots? Or, were the ballots in bins that were never counted?<\/p>\n

The media is not clear on this issue yet so we are going to have to wait to find this out. If the machines were, in fact, grabbing two or more ballots at a time jurisdictions around the country need to be made aware of this possibility.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile a report from Broward Co of the result of their state-mandated audit is a bit troubling. The county appears to have hand-counted one race on ballots from 16 precincts. The media is reporting that nine of the precincts hand-count matches the machine results. Seven precincts resembled original results by 95 percent or more. That is a huge number and should raise red flags.<\/p>\n

Instead one official said, “When you’re dealing with people and paper, that’s the best you’re going to get.”\u009d How about agreeing 100% and you keep counting until you are sure that the people and paper are not the problem and then you find out what problem the machines had?…<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n