{"id":6025,"date":"2008-05-27T13:29:55","date_gmt":"2008-05-27T20:29:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=6025"},"modified":"2008-05-28T12:53:46","modified_gmt":"2008-05-28T19:53:46","slug":"supreme-court-stops-reruns-of-hbos-recount","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=6025","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Stops Reruns of HBO&#8217;s &#8216;Recount&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/HBO_Recount_BegleySpacey.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\">Not really. But it&#8217;s a <a href=\"http:\/\/satiricalpolitical.com\/?p=1864\">damned funny headline<\/a>. And it&#8217;s probably accurate &#8220;enough&#8221; for the <i>New York Times<\/i>, where accuracy doesn&#8217;t much matter anymore, apparently.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ll have some of our own thoughts very soon on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hbo.com\/films\/recount\/\"><i>Recount<\/i><\/a>, which we much enjoyed over the holiday weekend. Until then, our <em>preview<\/em> of the new HBO film, filed before we finally got to see it when in premiered Sunday night, is <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=6011\">posted here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>But it&#8217;s worth noting, for the moment, that the <i>New York Times<\/i>, the disgraced &#8220;Paper of Record,&#8221; even today persists in misreporting the story of the 2000 Florida Election debacle. As <a href=\"http:\/\/smirkingchimp.com\/thread\/14875\">Larry Beinhart documents today<\/a> at Smirking Chimp:<\/p>\n<div class=\"media\">\n<blockquote><p><i>&#8220;In 2001 painstaking postmortems of the Florida count, one by The New York Times and another by a consortium of newspapers, concluded that <strong>Mr. Bush would have come out slightly ahead, even if all the votes counted throughout the state had been retallied.<\/strong>&#8220;<\/i><br \/>\n&#8212; Alessandra Stanley, New York Times, <u>May 23, 2008<\/u> in a review of the HBO television movie, Recount<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That&#8217;s not true.<\/p>\n<p>The New York Times did not do its own recount. It did participate in a consortium. Here&#8217;s what they actually said:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i>&#8220;<strong>If all the ballots had been reviewed under any of seven single standards<\/strong>, and combined with the results of an examination of overvotes, <strong>Mr. Gore would have won, by a very narrow margin.<\/strong>&#8220;<\/i><br \/>\n&#8212; Ford Fessenden And John M. Broder, New York Times, <u>November 12, 2001<\/u><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Why did Ms. Stanley make such an important and fundamental error?<\/p>\n<p>It is not a trivial matter. It is a common piece of misinformation. Many, many people believe it. Now a few more do, as a result of Ms. Stanley&#8217;s review.<\/p>\n<p>It is not a trivial matter. Because that misinformation was created by one of the most bizarre, and still completely unexplained, journalistic events in modern times.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s what happened.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Read <a href=\"http:\/\/smirkingchimp.com\/thread\/14875\">Beinhart&#8217;s piece<\/a> for the remarkable details in what really <em>is<\/em> one of the &#8220;most bizarre, and still completely unexplained, journalist events in modern times.&#8221; Unfortunately, he doesn&#8217;t include links in his coverage (please add them if you can, Larry!), but for the doubters, here&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20110921065850\/http:\/\/www.aei.org\/docLib\/20040526_KeatingPaper.pdf\">the report [PDF]<\/a> showing that Al Gore <i>did<\/i>, in fact, receive more votes in Florida in 2000 than George W. Bush. That, despite the stunningly <i>contrary<\/i> headlines, as Beinhart shows, from almost every paper that reported on that complete state count. Even the papers who bothered to report &#8212; if you read them closely enough &#8212; that Gore received more votes than Bush, still used inexplicably misleading headlines for the story.<\/p>\n<p>Given the wholly inaccurate claim, as includied in their review of <em>Recount<\/em>, it would appear that <em>NYTimes<\/em> is intent on simply ensuring the matter is <em>inaccurately<\/em> reported forever. We&#8217;ll remember to keep that, and their year-long front page pre-Iraq War-mongering, in mind next time we&#8217;re inevitably told by some wingnut on the radio, just how &#8220;liberal&#8221; the <em>NYTimes<\/em> is.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/SyndeyPollack.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"left\">Also, it&#8217;s with no small amount of sadness that we note the passing of legendary <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm0001628\/\">producer\/director\/actor Sydney Pollack<\/a> who <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20080526.wpollack0526\/BNStory\/Entertainment\/home?cid=al_gam_mostview\">died on Monday<\/a> at the age of 73.<\/p>\n<p>Pollack had been slated to direct <i>Recount<\/i> originally, but was forced to bow out due to being diagnosed with cancer last August. He lived, at least, long enough to see <i>Recount<\/i> premiered on Sunday night on HBO. He had stayed on with the production as Executive Producer.<\/p>\n<p>Given his great sense of humor, we&#8217;d like to believe he would well have appreciated the satirical headline above.<\/p>\n<div class=\"BBTOORepost\">Prices now <i>slashed<\/i> in <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=5705\"><strong>The BRAD BLOG&#8217;s 2008 Election Integrity Fund Drive!<\/strong><\/a> Please support our continuing coverage of your election system, as found <em>nowhere<\/em> else. <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=5705\">Click here<\/a> for a number of cool new collector&#8217;s edition Premium products <b>now available starting at just $5!<\/b><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Not really. But it&#8217;s a damned funny headline. And it&#8217;s probably accurate &#8220;enough&#8221; for the New York Times, where accuracy doesn&#8217;t much matter anymore, apparently. We&#8217;ll have some of our own thoughts very soon on Recount, which we much enjoyed over the holiday weekend. Until then, our preview of the new HBO film, filed before [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[25,63,6,16,197,188,148,313],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-6025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-al-gore","category-election-2000","category-election-irregularities","category-florida","category-in-memoriam","category-mainstream-media-failure","category-new-york-times","category-us-supreme-court"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6025"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6025\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6025"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=6025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}