![](\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/HillaryClinton_Confetti.jpg\")
Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is the luckiest woman in the world. Just when it looks like she’ll have no chance to become the party’s nominee, extraordinary good news comes her way, just at the last minute. Again.<\/p>\nDemocratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is the luckiest woman in the world. Just when it looks like she’ll have no chance to become the party’s nominee, extraordinary good news comes her way, just at the last minute. Again.<\/p>\n
Take, for example, yesterday’s Pennsylvania Primary. For weeks we heard endlessly how she would need a double-digit victory margin in the Keystone State to offer a legitimate reason for her to stay in the race. And, as the gods<\/a> would have it, she achieved the ability to trumpet that double-digit margin by a single tenth of a percent.<\/p>\n With 99.51% of the vote reportedly counted as of this moment, according to the PA Dept. of State’s own numbers<\/a>, it’s Clinton’s 54.6% to Obama’s 45.4%.<\/p>\n So, in truth, that’s actually just a 9.2-point difference<\/a>, but, as luck would have it for the New York Senator, rounding each of those numbers to their nearest percent, as the bulk of the media were happy to do today, allows for a nice, easily-trumpeted, double-digit, 55% to 45% number that can be reported<\/a> far<\/a> and wide<\/a>!<\/p>\n The stunning turn of good fortune comes on the heels of Clinton’s last make-or-break moment back in New Hampshire<\/a>, when conventional wisdom had all but counted her out after her loss to Obama in the Iowa Caucus. But, there again, Clinton came through, despite both pre-election<\/a> and exit poll<\/a> numbers which all, almost uniformly, predicted she’d face a thumpin’.<\/p>\n Of course, you conspiracy theorists out there are likely to spin this tale of remarkable providence, into a shadowy tale of skulduggery by supporters of a Clinton nomination, be they Democrats or Republicans, who’d rather see her, instead of Obama, go up against John McCain in the fall.<\/p>\n But you’d have not an iota of actual proof<\/i> to support your paranoid suspicions…<\/p>\n <\/p>\n When spinning your fantastic yarns, you fail to show respect<\/i> for the will of the voters in both NH and PA who expressed their…well, not the voters per se, but the election officials, who dutifully certified that…well, not the election officials actually, but the vote counting computers which reportedly reported numbers that prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Hillary Clinton won dramatically in both states!<\/p>\n