{"id":5237,"date":"2007-11-01T20:00:06","date_gmt":"2007-11-02T03:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=5237"},"modified":"2007-11-02T07:20:19","modified_gmt":"2007-11-02T14:20:19","slug":"daily-voting-news-for-november-01-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=5237","title":{"rendered":"‘Daily Voting News’ For November 01, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"

Guest Blogged by John Gideon of VotersUnite.org<\/a><\/i><\/p>\n

<\/a>Last Nov. 55% of the voters in Sarasota Co Florida spoke with their votes for optical scan voting and for a meaningful audit of the ballots. Before the measure went on the ballot the county and state went to court and argued that the charter amendment would result in a violation of the state constitution. The court disagreed and the voters won. Yesterday a state appeals court decided against the will of the voters and for the county Supervisor of Elections and the SoS. The ruling was partially moot because the county is going to optical-scan machines, as is the state due in part to the pressure from passage of the amendment. However, the voters lose the ability to have an audit that will mean anything at all. They voted for an audit of 5% of all precincts. Instead the state is working on an audit of 1 to 2% of the precincts in each county and one race on those ballots AND this audit cannot happen until AFTER the election is certified….<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n