{"id":5162,"date":"2007-10-15T05:35:23","date_gmt":"2007-10-15T12:35:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=5162"},"modified":"2007-10-19T14:28:10","modified_gmt":"2007-10-19T21:28:10","slug":"doj-voting-rights-chief-john-tanner-to-speak-at-uc-berkeley-this-thursday","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=5162","title":{"rendered":"DoJ Voting Rights Chief John Tanner to Speak at UC Berkeley This Thursday"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/JohnTanner_SpeaksAgain.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"left\">U.S. House Judiciary Committee staff informs us that October 30th will be the day for hearings with John Tanner, the DoJ Civil Rights Division&#8217;s Voting Section chief.  Tanner has caused a bit of a stir of late by suggesting that minorities needn&#8217;t worry about being disenfranchised at the polls by restrictive Photo ID laws because they &#8220;die first&#8221; before become elderly (the original twisted <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=5145\">BRAD BLOG video exclusive of Tanner&#8217;s comments here<\/a>). As well, Tanner&#8217;s previous <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=5158\">bizarre and unprecedented justifications<\/a> on behalf of the DoJ, for why minorities have only themselves to blame for not being able to vote in Ohio in the 2004 Presidential Election have once again <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=5159\">attracted the attention of John Conyers<\/a> and his staff.<\/p>\n<p>Though the hearing where Tanner will testify is currently planned for the 30th, we&#8217;re told it won&#8217;t be &#8220;official&#8221; until it appears on the <a href=\"http:\/\/judiciary.house.gov\/Schedule.aspx\">official schedule<\/a> for the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties &#8212; usually a week or so prior to the hearing.<\/p>\n<p>In the meantime, however, democracy and accountability fans in the Northern California area may get their Tanner fix this Thursday, as he&#8217;s schedule to appear for a talk at UC Berkley&#8217;s Institute of Governmental Studies. The talk is scheduled for 3:30p-5:00p at the Institute&#8217;s Library, 109 Moses Hall, as sponsored by the UC Berkeley Center for Latino Policy Research and the Election Administration Research Center (EARC). <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.lib.berkeley.edu\/whats-new.php\/2007\/10\/11\/election_administration_and_voting_right\">More details here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Tanner&#8217;s recent unbelievable comments to the National Latino Congresso &#8212; &#8220;It&#8217;s probably true that among those who don&#8217;t [have Photo ID], it&#8217;s primarily elderly persons. And that&#8217;s a shame. Of course&#8230;our society is such that minorities don&#8217;t become elderly. The way that white people do. They die first.&#8221; &#8212; made their way to both <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/10\/11\/AR2007101102146.html?wpisrc=newsletter&#038;wpisrc=newsletter\">the <i>Washington Post<\/i><\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=5158\">the U.S. House Judiciary Committee<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So who knows what he&#8217;ll say next?!<\/p>\n<p>We hope a few <a href=\"http:\/\/www.BradBlog.com\">BRAD BLOG<\/a> readers who may be concerned with some of Tanner&#8217;s statements and behavior at the DoJ might find their way to showing up at his UC Berkeley event this week to video tape and\/or ask a few tough questions of the man who oversees <i>voting rights<\/i> on behalf of the federal government.<\/p>\n<p> If so, we hope you&#8217;ll <a href=\"mailto:Brad@Bradblog.com\">share any notable comments (hopefully on video or audio) with us<\/a>!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>U.S. House Judiciary Committee staff informs us that October 30th will be the day for hearings with John Tanner, the DoJ Civil Rights Division&#8217;s Voting Section chief. Tanner has caused a bit of a stir of late by suggesting that minorities needn&#8217;t worry about being disenfranchised at the polls by restrictive Photo ID laws because [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[192,223,6,211,321,156,243],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-5162","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-accountability","category-dept-of-justice","category-election-irregularities","category-john-conyers","category-john-tanner","category-voter-id","category-voter-registration","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5162","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5162"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5162\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5162"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=5162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}