{"id":5072,"date":"2007-09-15T15:43:40","date_gmt":"2007-09-15T22:43:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=5072"},"modified":"2007-09-16T04:31:31","modified_gmt":"2007-09-16T11:31:31","slug":"white-house-lies-about-coalition-in-iraq-go-back-atleast-as-far-as-2004","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=5072","title":{"rendered":"White House Lies About Coalition in Iraq Go Back Atleast as Far as 2004"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/BushSpeech_Iraq_091307_Liar.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\">During last Wednesday&#8217;s televised address from the Oval Office, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2007\/09\/20070913-2.html\">George W. Bush said<\/a>, &#8220;We thank the 36 nations who have troops on the ground in Iraq.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>As it turns out, you&#8217;ll be stunned to learn that his number was a lie. But it wouldn&#8217;t be the first time the Administration has lied about who is, and isn&#8217;t, a part of the so-called &#8220;Multinational Coalition&#8221; in Iraq, as <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=695\">The BRAD BLOG reported exclusively<\/a> as far back as October of 2004, prior to the Presidential Election. <\/p>\n<p>Concerning Bush&#8217;s &#8220;36 nations&#8221; mentioned last week, Spencer Ackerman reports, in an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tpmmuckraker.com\/archives\/004192.php\">exclusive over at TPM<\/a>, that the number is fudged at best, and just another unsupportable, outright lie by the administration at worst. The White House&#8217;s fuzzy math used to comprise the &#8220;36 nations&#8221; with &#8220;troops on the ground in Iraq&#8221; apparently includes several nations which &#8220;aren&#8217;t in Iraq in any capacity anymore,&#8221; according to Ackerman.<\/p>\n<p>The number also includes Canada&#8217;s <i>one soldier<\/i> who had been serving at the United Nations Assistance Mission in Iraq (UNAMI), who has since been withdrawn; New Zealand&#8217;s <i>single troop<\/i> (yes, like Canada, just one!) commitment to UNAMI; Tonga&#8217;s now-withdrawn force; a single <em>press aide<\/em> from Iceland; and an unknown number from Hungary which may, or may not, have anybody still in Iraq at all as part of a tiny NATO contingent.<\/p>\n<p>Bush&#8217;s prepared <strike>statement<\/strike> lie on national television last week, however, simply continues the pattern set years ago, prior to the 2004 Presidential Election, by Dick Cheney, as <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=819\">The BRAD BLOG exposed in a series of reports<\/a> back then in what would become our first breakthrough story to be picked up by both national and international media alike&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=819\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/Scrub_mediumsmall.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"left\"><\/a>The expos\u00e9 came about after Cheney had angrily attacked John Edwards during the Vice-Presidential Debate after Edwards had the temerity (and accuracy) to suggest that American forces were taking &#8220;90 percent of <em>coalition<\/em> casualties.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Dick Cheney&#8217;s angry, disingenuous response in turn was to charge that Edwards was &#8220;dead wrong&#8221; and that his comments were &#8220;beyond the pale&#8221; because he wasn&#8217;t including <em>Iraq<\/em> among his list of &#8220;<em>coalition<\/em> casualties.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But upon checking the White House website to see if <i>they themselves<\/i> had listed Iraq on their &#8220;Coalition of the Willing&#8221; page, we found that though the link to the page was still there, the page itself, which had once listed coalition nations, had been conveniently, if clumsily, scrubbed from the site entirely.<\/p>\n<p>After our original report, we began receiving tips that other inconvenient truths had been excised as well. For example, the video of Bush announcing that he was &#8220;not that concerned about&#8221; Osama Bin Laden, had <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=777\">been removed<\/a> after he&#8217;d pronounced in the third Presidential debate: &#8220;Gosh, I just don&#8217;t think I ever said I&#8217;m not worried about Osama bin Laden. It&#8217;s kind of one of those exaggerations.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Media pressure in the wake of the story, and the multitudes of additional embarrassing information revealed as missing, eventually led the White House webmasters to spend untold hours <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=852\">restoring terrabytes<\/a> of audio and video to their website, in the final week of the 2004 campaign, after we revealed the scrubbing to be in apparent <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=816\">violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1978<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Among other media, the story was covered by <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=807\">the AFP<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=818\"><i>Washington Post<\/i><\/a> at the time. <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=1141\">Reuters<\/a> would eventually pick up the story as well &#8212; an incredible three months later, in late January of 2005.<\/p>\n<p>(A special coverage page with all of the key articles in the series is <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=819\">posted here<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p>Nonetheless, the pattern of both lying and attempts at re-writing history and scrubbing official records was continued by the White House long since. As has the pattern of <i>bloggers<\/i> covering what the mainstream media have failed to.<\/p>\n<p>For those who are finally &#8220;sorry&#8221; about their vote for Bush in 2004, we might suggest that had you read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.BradBlog.com\">The BRAD BLOG<\/a> at the time, there would be few, if any, surprises for you today.<\/p>\n<p>The Bush Reign of Lies and Betrayal continues apace, to quote David Byrne, &#8220;same as it ever was.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>During last Wednesday&#8217;s televised address from the Oval Office, George W. Bush said, &#8220;We thank the 36 nations who have troops on the ground in Iraq.&#8221; As it turns out, you&#8217;ll be stunned to learn that his number was a lie. But it wouldn&#8217;t be the first time the Administration has lied about who is, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[26,24],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-5072","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-brad-blog","category-iraq-war","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5072","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5072"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5072\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5072"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5072"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5072"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=5072"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}