{"id":4988,"date":"2007-08-21T20:00:47","date_gmt":"2007-08-22T03:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=4988"},"modified":"2007-08-22T02:01:12","modified_gmt":"2007-08-22T09:01:12","slug":"daily-voting-news-for-august-21-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=4988","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Daily Voting News&#8217; For August 21, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>Guest Blogged by John Gideon of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.VotersUnite.org\">VotersUnite.org<\/a><\/i><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.VotersUnite.org\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/DVNLogo.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\"><\/a>Here we go again with more wrong-doing by a voting machine vendor. This time ES&#038;S (no surprise there) got caught modifying AutoMark voting machines used in many California counties by voters with disabilities. California state election law does not allow any modification to any voting system without notification to the SOS and a determination that the modification does not affect the accuracy and efficiency of that system. It seems that ES&#038;S made a modification to hundreds of AutoMark machines used in counties across the state and did it with no notification. The state has announced a public hearing for 20 September when specific relief will be discussed. That relief could be $10,000 per incident and\/or decertification and\/or banishment from the state for one to three years and\/or other fines or restitution including refund of all tax-payer money spent to purchase those machines. It will be interesting to see how many local election officials suddenly come to ES&#038;S&#8217;s defense. And the burning question is whether the modification was federally approved and how many other states have machines modified by ES&#038;S in the dark of the night?&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<div class=\"list\">\n<li>NAtional: Media Finally Question the Relationship Between Elections Officials and Voting Machine Companies <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=4984\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>NAtional: E-Voting Ballots May Not Be So Secret; Paper Trail Takes Away Anonymity <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20070820\/113332.shtml\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>NAtional: Dan Rather Report Examines Problems with Touchscreen Voting Machines <a href=\"http:\/\/www.votetrustusa.org\/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=2558&#038;Itemid=26\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>NAtional: Insider Trading at Diebold?<br \/>\nMass Sell-Off by Company Officers Occurs Simultaneously Just Days Prior to Stock Price Plunge, Announcement of Jettisoning of Election Division <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=4972\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>NAtional: Reply From AVS To EAC Response to AVS <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eac.gov\/docs\/Reply%20from%20AVS%20Reply%20to%20EAC%20(%208-17-07%20)%20DOC001%20(2).PDF\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>NAtional: EAC Notice of Non-Compliance To AVS (follow-up to AVS letter above) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eac.gov\/docs\/EAC%20response%20to%20AVS%20email%208.21.07.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: Did ES&#038;S Sell Uncertified Voting Equipment To California Counties?  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sos.ca.gov\/executive\/press_releases\/2007\/DB07_051.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: ES&#038;S Facing Massive Fines, Possible Decertification in CA for Use of Uncertified Modifications to Voting Systems <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=4985\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: ES&#038;S to be Rebuked, Fined and Possibly Banned in CA? <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.wired.com\/27bstroke6\/2007\/08\/ess-to-be-rebuk.html\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: State contends e-voting machines weren&#8217;t certified <a href=\"http:\/\/www.computerworld.com\/action\/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&#038;taxonomyName=government&#038;articleId=9031938&#038;taxonomyId=13&#038;intsrc=kc_top\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: California Hearing on Auto-Marks <a href=\"http:\/\/electionupdates.caltech.edu\/2007\/08\/california-hearing-on-auto-marks.html\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: The Vote: California Secretary of State Sets Hearing to Investigate Voting Machine Company <a href=\"http:\/\/www.govtech.com\/gt\/132046?topic=117688\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: Celebrate election transparency <a href=\"http:\/\/tracypress.com\/content\/view\/10739\/2244\/\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: Company Accused Of Selling Uncertified Voting Machines <a href=\"http:\/\/www.my58.com\/politics\/13943446\/detail.html\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: NEW: State threatens fines, ban against e-vote vendor <a href=\"http:\/\/www.insidebayarea.com\/ci_6680739\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: Riverside County &#8211; County studies voting options<br \/>\nLeasing machines for next year&#8217;s votes could save millions  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nctimes.com\/articles\/2007\/08\/21\/news\/californian\/4_01_518_20_07.txt\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: San Bernardino County &#8211; Ballots before board<br \/>\nSupervisors to decide whether vote will be on paper <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailybulletin.com\/news\/ci_6675923\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: San Bernardino Co. returns to paper <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pe.com\/localnews\/inland\/stories\/PE_News_Local_D_webvote22.19a2afb.html\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: San Bernardino County &#8211; SB County to return to paper ballots <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailybulletin.com\/news\/ci_6680232\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>CA: Solano County &#8211; County not sure what to expect as voting-machine tests continue <a href=\"http:\/\/www.timesheraldonline.com\/ci_6678588\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>IN: Voting machine company appeals $360,000 fine <a href=\"http:\/\/www.indystar.com\/apps\/pbcs.dll\/article?AID=\/20070821\/LOCAL19\/708210405\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>MS: Washington County &#8211; Officials: Availability of tapes wouldn&#8217;t have mattered for Knight  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ddtonline.com\/articles\/2007\/08\/21\/news\/news2.txt\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>NY: Chautauqua County &#8211; Lever machines OK for now <a href=\"http:\/\/www.observertoday.com\/articles.asp?articleID=15220\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li>OH: Board: rhymes with bored <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cleveland.com\/news\/naymik\/index.ssf?\/base\/opinion-0\/1187685997149890.xml&#038;coll=2&#038;thispage=1\" target=\"_blank\"><i>LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<\/div>\n<p><b>**&#8221;Daily Voting News&#8221; is meant as a comprehensive listing of reports each day concerning issues related to election and voting news around the country regardless of quality or political slant. Therefore, items listed in &#8220;Daily Voting News&#8221; may not reflect the opinions of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.VotersUnite.org\">VotersUnite.Org<\/a> or <a href=\"http:\/\/www.BradBlog.com\">BradBlog.Com<\/a>**<\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Guest Blogged by John Gideon of VotersUnite.org Here we go again with more wrong-doing by a voting machine vendor. This time ES&#038;S (no surprise there) got caught modifying AutoMark voting machines used in many California counties by voters with disabilities. California state election law does not allow any modification to any voting system without notification [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-4988","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-daily-voting-news","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4988","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4988"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4988\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4988"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4988"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4988"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=4988"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}