{"id":4953,"date":"2007-08-13T20:00:15","date_gmt":"2007-08-14T03:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=4953"},"modified":"2007-08-14T15:38:27","modified_gmt":"2007-08-14T22:38:27","slug":"daily-voting-news-for-august-13-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=4953","title":{"rendered":"‘Daily Voting News’ For August 13, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"

Guest Blogged by John Gideon of VotersUnite.org<\/a><\/i><\/p>\n

<\/a>Today’s news brings more complaints and whining from California election officials. Last week I questioned whether Diebold could have got word of problems with their software in Florida then made needed corrections then had the software inspected and certified for use all in less than two weeks. Today, the report from Florida State University was released….<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
  • NAtional: ‘DAN RATHER REPORTS’ to Present Conclusive Evidence of Touch-Screen Voting Machine Failures LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • NAtional: A Timely Second Look at Mark Crispin Miller’s “Fooled Again” LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • NAtional: Tumbling Down: Diebold Stock Price Falls in Sell Off as Still More Company Fraud Comes to Light LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • CA: The Vote: California Counties Respond to Secretary of State’s E-Voting Machine Decision LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • CA: California: The Top to Bottom Review LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • CA: California Puts Limits on Use of E-voting Systems LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • CA: Opinion – Vote absentee to avoid e-vote LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • CA: Alameda County – Security steps may endanger early vote
    \nCounty registrar says new requirements could make multiple ballot-casting sites impossible     LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • CA: Monterey County – Voting machine problems may mean delayed vote counts LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • CA: San Bernardino County – E-voting ruling under scrutiny in S.B. County LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • CA: Santa Cruz County “\u201c Opinion – As We See It: E-voting chaos LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • FL: Software Review and Security Analysis of the Diebold Voting
    \nMachine Software     LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • IA: Iowa: Ames Straw Poll Holdup Shows Why Paper Ballots Are Best LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • NH: Criticized voting system used here
    \nState officials stress ballots are not at risk     LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • OH: Editorial – No confidence LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • WI: Congress debates voting-equipment bill
    \nCounty clerks express doubt over need for new nationwide standards     LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n
  • WV: Kanawha County – Vote results could be delayed for weeks
    \nRecount likely “\u201d regardless of outcome of canvass on table games referendum     LINK<\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<\/div>\n

    **”Daily Voting News” is meant as a comprehensive listing of reports each day concerning issues related to election and voting news around the country regardless of quality or political slant. Therefore, items listed in “Daily Voting News” may not reflect the opinions of VotersUnite.Org<\/a> or BradBlog.Com<\/a>**<\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Guest Blogged by John Gideon of VotersUnite.org Today’s news brings more complaints and whining from California election officials. Last week I questioned whether Diebold could have got word of problems with their software in Florida then made needed corrections then had the software inspected and certified for use all in less than two weeks. Today, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-4953","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-daily-voting-news","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4953","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4953"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4953\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4953"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4953"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=4953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}