{"id":368,"date":"2004-08-01T12:35:43","date_gmt":"2004-08-01T16:35:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.test.bradblog.com\/?p=368"},"modified":"2004-08-01T12:35:43","modified_gmt":"2004-08-01T16:35:43","slug":"home-of-the-free","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=368","title":{"rendered":"Home of the Free?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Updating a previous item<\/a> on the Bush-Cheney campaign requiring a signed pledge of loyalty<\/i> to George W. Bush before allowing voters to attend a Dick Cheney campaign event…<\/p>\n

Drudge is finally running a piece<\/a> on this now that it’s being suggested that “some Democrats<\/i>” were required to sign loyalty oaths.<\/p>\n

Am I just a pinko, commie, terrorist Freedom Hater if I think that shouldn’t really make any damn difference…here in America<\/i>?! The story doesn’t exactly inform us how campaign officials knew who were Democrats and who weren’t, and even goes on to say that “Some Democrats who are Bush supporters were welcomed without signing anything.”<\/p>\n

The story also does not explain how the Bush campaign would know which Democrats were Bush supporters and which weren’t.<\/p>\n

But read on…<\/p>\n

Vietnam veteran Michael Ortiz y Pino said he refused to sign the pledge and was refused tickets.<\/p>\n

Ortiz y Pino said he was asked if he associated with veterans, pro-life, gun rights or teacher groups.<\/p>\n

Neither man wanted to give driver’s license numbers but did so.<\/p>\n

“I said why do you need that?” Ortiz y Pino said.<\/p>\n

A campaign worker, he said, replied: “Secret Service stuff.”<\/p><\/div>\n

PLEASE, is there any conservative out there who can explain to me how this is what you are looking for in a “conservative” nominee for President<\/i> of the United States (of America!<\/i>)??<\/p>\n

Once again…here is what the “pledge” says. The one you must sign to see your Vice-President speak during a Presidential Campaign:<\/p>\n

“I, (full name) … do herby (sic) endorse George W. Bush for reelection of the United States.” It later adds that, “In signing the above endorsement you are consenting to use and release of your name by Bush-Cheney as an endorser of President Bush.”<\/div>\n

Dan Foley, of the Bush Campaign, explains…<\/p>\n

“The endorsement pledges, he said, were for screening purposes, not for any advertisement listing names of Democrats who support Bush.<\/div>\n

Oh, well that’s a relief! <\/p>\n

Anyway, the story is now linked on Drudge, so it should be reported by the Mainstream Media shortly. As long as it hasn’t been taken it down by Monday.<\/p>\n

UPDATE<\/b>: A follow-up piece<\/a> from the Albuquerque Journal<\/i> would seem to defy the “some Democrats” report which claimed that it was just people who called from “a line that self-identified as ACT, America Coming Together, an activist group that supports Kerry.”<\/p>\n

As well, it quotes a Republican National Committee spokesperson, Yier Shi, explaining the policy for restricting the event — at a public school gymnasium!<\/i> — only to the loyal ones:<\/p>\n

Democrats, independents and others were welcome to attend the speech, he said\u2014 as long as they like Bush and Cheney.
\n And people should understand that Cheney is visiting New Mexico in the role of a candidate for re-election, Shi said, explaining that Republicans are treating the trip as a political campaign visit and not as an official visit of the vice president.
\n “The argument that you’re an American and you have a right to see the vice president\u2014 you can when he comes to New Mexico on an official visit,” Shi said. “On this visit, he’s Dick Cheney, a candidate for vice president and he happens to also be the vice president.”<\/div>\n

Got that distinction?<\/p>\n

This is a campaign in big — very big — trouble.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Updating a previous item on the Bush-Cheney campaign requiring a signed pledge of loyalty to George W. Bush before allowing voters to attend a Dick Cheney campaign event… Drudge is finally running a piece on this now that it’s being suggested that “some Democrats” were required to sign loyalty oaths. Am I just a pinko, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=368"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}