{"id":2930,"date":"2006-06-08T12:27:20","date_gmt":"2006-06-08T16:27:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.test.bradblog.com\/?p=2930"},"modified":"2006-06-11T13:08:34","modified_gmt":"2006-06-11T20:08:34","slug":"busbybilbray-election-in-doubt-the-silence-is-deafening","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=2930","title":{"rendered":"BUSBY\/BILBRAY ELECTION IN DOUBT: The Silence is Deafening&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>ABC News is featuring <a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/print?id=2047867\">this AP story<\/a> on their website:<\/p>\n<div class=\"media\"><b>Republican Wins Bellwether House Race<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><i>Ex-GOP Congressman Wins California Race for Scandal-Rocked House Seat As 8 States Hold Votes<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><i>By ROBERT TANNER &#8211; The Associated Press<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n<p>&#8211; A former Republican congressman narrowly beat his Democratic rival early Wednesday for the right to fill the House seat once held by jailed Randy &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham, a race closely watched as a possible early barometer of next fall&#8217;s vote. <\/p>\n<p>Republican Brian Bilbray emerged victorious after a costly and contentious special election race against Democrat Francine Busby, a local school board member who ran against Cunningham in 2004.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Okay, AP. Prove it. I dare you. You can&#8217;t. <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/archives\/00002924.htm\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/FrancineBusby_Winner_Med.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\"><\/a>Not without a 100% manual, hand-count of <i>all<\/i> the optically-scanned paper ballots and touch-screen &#8220;paper trails&#8221; from Tuesday&#8217;s CA 50th Congressional district race for the U.S. House of representatives. And even then, depending on the margin of difference after the op-scan ballots are hand-counted, you will be unable to prove that the race was decided correctly if it should turn out the number of votes cast on touch-screen machines was more than the margin of difference after the op-scan ballots are actually counted (<i>by hand!<\/i>)<\/p>\n<p>The deafening, dumbstruck <i>silence<\/i> after I posted my article yesterday, headlined <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/archives\/00002924.htm\">&#8216;Results of Close Busby\/Bilbray U.S. House Special Election in Doubt!,&#8217;<\/a> is <i>deafening<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, I know the headline is unsettling. As are the implications of the piece. I will hope, however, that most of you who know what I report at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.BradBlog.com\">The BRAD BLOG<\/a> also know that what I report, I source with independently verifiable information. So you don&#8217;t need to trust me. And you shouldn&#8217;t. No more than you should trust the <i>words<\/i> of San Diego County&#8217;s Registrar of Voters.<\/p>\n<p>The arguments presented in <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/archives\/00002924.htm\">yesterday&#8217;s article<\/a> are <i><b>airtight<\/b><\/i>.  The have been vetted by a number of election experts and computer scientists. So far, not a <i>single<\/i> human being has presented me with a flaw in my logic or contentions.<\/p>\n<p>Mind you, I have never reported that <i>any<\/i> election was &#8220;stolen.&#8221; Not even the 2000 Presidential (which wasn&#8217;t stolen, as much as given away by the Supreme Court), nor the 2004 Presidential Election, which evidence shows would most likely have gone to Kerry had the votes actually been counted. But I have never claimed that election was &#8220;stolen&#8221; either, because we simply do not know. Until there is evidence, I do not report it as such.<\/p>\n<p>I am not saying, in <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/archives\/00002924.htm\">my article yesterday<\/a>, that the Busby\/Bilbray election was &#8220;stolen&#8221; either.<\/p>\n<p>Nor have I charged there has been any fraud. This is (for now) about <i>confidence<\/i> in verifiable results in an American election. So far, there is no basis to have <i>any<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Nor am I one of those who believes that legitimate elections can <i>only<\/i> be carried out on 100% hand-counted paper ballots.<\/p>\n<p>This one, however, given the specific machines in use, which have been <i>proven<\/i> to be easilly tamperable and hackable, without a trace being left behind, (and admitted as such by even the company who makes them!) is a different matter. Add to that, security measures were completely compromised by <i>sending the machines home with poll workers, in some cases, for weeks at a time, prior to the election<\/i> and we&#8217;ve got a <i>no confidence<\/i> case on our hands.<\/p>\n<p>The burden is now on elections officials &#8212; who we pay to run accurate elections &#8212; to <i>prove<\/i> the race was counted accurately. Let&#8217;s see them do it.<\/p>\n<p>I do not champion, nor traffic in, &#8220;conspiracy theories,&#8221; as those of you who know my work likely already understand. What I reported in yesterday&#8217;s story was not editorial or &#8220;conspiracy theory,&#8221; but plain scientific <i>fact<\/i>, resting on an enormous body of peer-reviewed, undisputed, scientific <i>evidence<\/i>. The contention offered in the piece then is summarized thusly &#8212; <i>presuming the integrity of the chain of custody for the paper ballots and the &#8220;paper trails&#8221; is still demonstrably secured<\/i>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><b>Unless every optically-scanned ballot is counted <i>by hand<\/i> &#8212; and <i>only<\/i> if the resultant margin after that count is larger than the number of votes cast on the touch-screen systems &#8212; can there be <i>any<\/i> confidence that the results of the U.S. House race for CA&#8217;s 50th congressional district are accurate.<\/p>\n<p>I challenge <i>anybody<\/i> to prove otherwise. Anybody. It cannot be done.<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I welcome any and all questions about the logic or accuracy of my contentions. So far, I have received none.<\/p>\n<p>If, after reading <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/archives\/00002924.htm\">yesterday&#8217;s article<\/a> in full &#8212; and asking any questions of me concerning the logic or evidence (I will try to keep an eye on comments left here) &#8212;  you <i>still<\/i> do not understand what&#8217;s going on here, and what&#8217;s at stake in <i>your<\/i> elections, then you are simply heading into November while whistling past democracy&#8217;s graveyard.<\/p>\n<p>That goes for you, AP.  (And ABC, since you&#8217;re running the article on your site and yet have failed to run extremely important stories on American election integrity issues which, unlike AP&#8217;s story, <i>are<\/i> demonstrably provable and feature actual <i>evidence<\/i>.)<\/p>\n<p>Do you both, AP and ABC, stand behind this report? If so, I dare you to prove the contentions made in your article are backed up with <i>any<\/i> verifiable evidence. You can&#8217;t. And you won&#8217;t. The contentions made in my article, however, certainly are. I feel it&#8217;s my responsibility to be sure of that when I file a report. Why don&#8217;t you?<\/p>\n<p>Elections should be <i>verifiable and provable<\/i>. This one, at least as of now, is most decidely <i>not<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>\n<b>UPDATE:<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/archives\/00002930.htm\">SD County Poll workers write in about voting machine sleepovers&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p><b>UPDATE: 6\/9\/06<\/b>: <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/archives\/00002934.htm\">New numbers reported from San Diego county&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ABC News is featuring this AP story on their website: Republican Wins Bellwether House Race Ex-GOP Congressman Wins California Race for Scandal-Rocked House Seat As 8 States Hold Votes By ROBERT TANNER &#8211; The Associated Press &#8211; A former Republican congressman narrowly beat his Democratic rival early Wednesday for the right to fill the House [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-2930","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-busbybilbray","category-dieboldpremier","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2930","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2930"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2930\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2930"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2930"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2930"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=2930"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}