{"id":2730,"date":"2006-04-24T15:34:22","date_gmt":"2006-04-24T19:34:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.test.bradblog.com\/?p=2730"},"modified":"2007-09-09T01:28:42","modified_gmt":"2007-09-09T08:28:42","slug":"cnn-poll-bush-approval-at-32","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=2730","title":{"rendered":"CNN POLL: Bush Approval at 32%"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2006\/POLITICS\/04\/24\/bush.poll\/index.html\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/BushApprovalRating_CNN32.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\"><\/a>We&#8217;ve truly enjoyed watching the contortions of Bush&#8217;s GOP dead-enders who spin each and every new poll showing Bush at his lowest approval ratings yet, by trying to say that the numbers have &#8220;bottomed out&#8221;, &#8220;can&#8217;t get any lower&#8221; and therefore &#8220;have nowhere to go but up.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>We (not so) respectfully disagree.<\/p>\n<p>On the heels of last week&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/archives\/00002715.htm\">Fox News Poll<\/a> showing Bush at 33% (which also revealed Republican voters as desperately <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/archives\/00002718.htm\">out of touch<\/a> with mainstream America,) followed by today&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2006\/POLITICS\/04\/24\/bush.poll\/index.html\">CNN\/Opinion Research Corporation poll<\/a> just out showing Bush at an <i>all-new<\/i> new low of 32% with Republican support dropping off precipitously, we see no reason why numbers in the 20&#8217;s (and falling) shouldn&#8217;t be far behind.<\/p>\n<p>Do you?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We&#8217;ve truly enjoyed watching the contortions of Bush&#8217;s GOP dead-enders who spin each and every new poll showing Bush at his lowest approval ratings yet, by trying to say that the numbers have &#8220;bottomed out&#8221;, &#8220;can&#8217;t get any lower&#8221; and therefore &#8220;have nowhere to go but up.&#8221; We (not so) respectfully disagree. On the heels [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[192,76,300],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-2730","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-accountability","category-election-2006","category-republicans","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2730","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2730"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2730\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2730"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=2730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}