With so much going on, we haven’t had much time to report here on the extraordinary outcome of last Tuesday’s election in Ohio where the crooked state that brung you — by hook and<\/i> by crook — a second term for George W. Bush may have turned in results so staggeringly impossible, that perhaps even the Ohio Mainstream Corporate Media will have no choice but to look into it. And that’s a good thing.<\/p>\n
As usual, the Free Press’<\/i> heroic Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman are on the case. Their article on what happened on ballot issues 1 through 5 last week is A MUST READ<\/a> for anybody who still gives the slightest damn about whatever democracy might be left in America.<\/p>\n We’ll try to summarize here briefly. There were five initiatives on the ballot last week. Issue 1 was a controversial proposition for $2 billion in new state spending. The Christian Right was opposed (because some of the new funds might go to stem cell research), but otherwise, the Republican Governor Taft’s Administration (he recently pleaded guilty to several counts of corruption) was pushing it hard alongside progressives in the state.<\/p>\n The Columbus Dispatch’s<\/i> pre-election polling, which Fritrakis and Wasserman describe as “uncannily accurate for decades”, called the race correctly within 1% of the final result. The margin of error for the poll was +\/- 2.5% with a 95% confidence interval. On Issue 1, the Dispatch<\/i> poll was right on the money. They predicted 53% in favor, the final result was 54% in favor.<\/p>\n But then came Issues 2 through 5 put forward by ReformOhioNow.org<\/a> — a bi-partisan coalition pushing these four initiatives for Electoral Reform in the Buckeye State largely in response to their shameful ’04 Election performance led by the extremely partisan Secretary of State (and Bush\/Cheney ’04 Co-Chair) J. Kenneth Blackwell.<\/p>\n On those four issues, which Blackwell and the Christian Right were against, the final results were impossibly different — and we mean impossibly!<\/i> — from both the Dispatch’s<\/i> final polling before the election and all reasoned common-sense. Take a look:<\/p>\n ISSUE 2<\/b> (Allow easier absentee balloting) ISSUE 3<\/b> (Revise campaign contribution limits) ISSUE 4<\/b> (Ind. Comm. to draw Congressional Districts) ISSUE 5<\/b> (Ind. Board instead of Sec. of State to oversee elections) Now, you tell us…What could possibly<\/i> explain such unheard of<\/i> differences between the Dispatch’s<\/i> poll and the final results?<\/p>\n Now, we’ll tell you…This was the year that Ohio, under the encouragement and mandates<\/i> of Blackwell, rolled out new Electronic Touch-Screen Voting Machines in 44 of its 88 counties…41 of them employing the same Diebold Touch-Screen Machines that California’s Republican Sec. of State decertified<\/i> in this state when 20% of them failed<\/i> this summer in the largest test of its kind ever held.<\/p>\n Those would be the very same Electronic Voting Machines which a recent GAO Report<\/a> (still unmentioned<\/a> by a single wire-service or mainstream American newspaper) confirmed to be easily hackable.<\/p>\n Will the absurdly skewed results from last Tuesday’s Ohio Election finally light a fire under the media — either nationally or just in Ohio alone — to look into what the hell is going on here?! We remain hopeful…if not optimistic.<\/p>\n The Free Press<\/i> article<\/a> is a must read, as mentioned, but we’ll share their closing thoughts here on the possible reasons for the wildly unexplained discrepancy between the final polling and the final results which, as they posit, are due to either a completely inexplicable breakdown of the Dispatch’s<\/i> historically accurate polling methods wildly beyond the margin-of-error for all initiatives except<\/i> Issue 1…or…somebody hacked that vote count:<\/p>\n And we can also, for all intents and purposes, forget about the future of American democracy.<\/p><\/div>\n Anybody in the Mainstream Media ready to give a damn yet?<\/p>\n
\nPRE-POLLING: 53% Yes, 27% No, 20% Undecided
\nFINAL RESULT: 54% Yes, 45% No<\/p>\n
\nPRE-POLLING: 59% Yes, 33% No, 9% Undecided
\nFINAL RESULT: 36% Yes, 63% No<\/p>\n
\nPRE-POLLING: 61% Yes, 25% No, 14% Undecided
\nFINAL RESULT: 33% Yes, 66% No<\/p>\n
\nPRE-POLLING: 31% Yes, 45% No, 25% Undecided
\nFINAL RESULT: 30% Yes, 69% No<\/p>\n
\nPRE-POLLING: 41% Yes, 43% No, 16% Undecided
\nFINAL RESULT: 29% Yes, 70% No<\/div>\n