{"id":12074,"date":"2017-03-21T17:52:02","date_gmt":"2017-03-22T00:52:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=12074"},"modified":"2017-03-21T17:51:06","modified_gmt":"2017-03-22T00:51:06","slug":"not-normalizing-a-stolen-us-supreme-court-bradcast-3212017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=12074","title":{"rendered":"(Not) Normalizing a Stolen U.S. Supreme Court: ‘BradCast’ 3\/21\/2017"},"content":{"rendered":"

On today’s BradCast<\/i><\/a>: Donald Trump’s U.S. Supreme Court nominee faced questions all day in the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. But what the hell is Judge Neil Gorsuch even doing there at all? And doesn’t normal coverage of the hearings do little more than normalize a decidedly abnormal situation? [Audio link to show follows below.<\/i>]\n

Donald Trump’s selection to fill the seat left vacant by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia more than a year ago, represents nothing less than a stolen seat on a stolen U.S. Supreme Court. If he is confirmed, Republicans are likely to be rewarded for their theft with a majority on the high court for another generation, following their unprecedented refusal to even hold hearings for Barack Obama’s nominee for the seat, Judge Merrick Garland.<\/p>\n

I’ve been wrestling with how to cover this week’s hearings, which I consider to be illegitimate (and that is true even setting aside the disturbing matter of Trump as President!) Professor Peter M. Shane<\/b> of Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law<\/a> joins me to try and help make sense of the situation. His recent piece at the American Constitutional Society<\/a>, cited by the New York Times<\/i><\/a> today, details how neither Democrats nor corporate media, to date, seem to have figured out how to issue any kind of institutional penalty for the GOP’s blatant, brazen and unheard of theft.<\/p>\n

Shane explains that, historically, despite Republican assertions to the contrary, “there is no close precedent” in history for what the GOP has done here. “The reason that they didn’t want Judge Garland to become Justice Garland was, of course, the fear that they would be losing what had been a secure 5-4 conservative majority on the court. But they also didn’t want to give him a hearing because they knew, if they gave him a hearing, that Judge Garland would appear to be so thoughtful, so reasonable, so accomplished and balanced a person, that it would be politically much more difficult to vote ‘no’. Nobody in the Senate is constitutionally obligated to vote in favor of Judge Garland, it would just be hard to explain why [they didn’t.]”<\/p>\n

So they stole the seat instead, by refusing to even hold a hearing, much less a vote. As to the Democrats’ lack of an organized response, such as a promise to filibuster Judge Gorsuch (or any other Trump nominee other than Garland), despite the threat of the GOP doing away with the filibuster for SCOTUS nominees, Shane observes: “It seems to me that the Democrats very frequently anticipate the political defeat that lies ahead, and just keep their powder dry for a fight that never happens.” He argues Dems are likely “worried about political blowback for being a fierce party of resistance,” adding: “That’s what the Republicans have been, increasingly, since 1980. If they’ve paid a penalty for it, I haven’t noticed.”<\/p>\n

Also on today’s program: While Congressional hearings have taken over the beginning of the week, House Republicans are making last minute changes<\/a> to their scheme<\/a> to replace the Affordable Care Act, by making it still crueler<\/a> for millions of Americans (but with even more kickbacks<\/a> for wealthy ones!) in hopes of wheeling and dealing<\/a> for enough votes to squeek by with passage in the U.S. House, where they plan to ram the bill through for a full floor vote this week before tossing it to the Senate.<\/p>\n

Finally: A majority<\/a> of Americans are unable to name even a single SCOTUS Justice, and the tax-payer cost for Trump’s constant weekend vacations could cover<\/a> four federal programs for the arts, the elderly, the jobless and the homeless that his budget proposal hopes to slash entirely…<\/p>\n

CLICK TO LISTEN OR DOWNLOAD SHOW!…<\/a><\/i><\/b>
\n[audio:http:\/\/bradblog.com\/audio\/BradCast_BradFriedman_AHCAChanges_PeterShane_StolenSCOTUS_032117.mp3]<\/blockquote>\n

* * *<\/b><\/center>While we post <\/i>The BradCast<\/a> here every day, and you can hear it across all of our great affiliate stations and websites, to automagically get new episodes as soon as they’re available sent right to your computer or personal device, subscribe for free at iTunes<\/a>, Stitcher<\/a>, TuneIn<\/a> or our native RSS feed<\/a>!<\/i><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The BRAD BLOG<\/strong>, The BradCast<\/em> and Green News Report<\/em> are all 100% independent and 100% listener and reader supported!<\/span>Please CLICK HERE to help support our work today!<\/a><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On today’s BradCast: Donald Trump’s U.S. Supreme Court nominee faced questions all day in the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. But what the hell is Judge Neil Gorsuch even doing there at all? And doesn’t normal coverage of the hearings do little more than normalize a decidedly abnormal situation? [Audio link to show follows below.] Donald […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[192,508,239,89,675,299,479,288,806,477,188,821,497,932,111,232,558,300,127,198,233,313],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-12074","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-accountability","category-antonin-scalia","category-barack-obama","category-media-appearance","category-bradcast","category-democrats","category-donald-trump","category-health-care","category-jeff-merkley","category-kpfk","category-mainstream-media-failure","category-merrick-garland","category-mitch-mcconnell","category-neil-gorsuch","category-new-york","category-patrick-leahy","category-paul-ryan","category-republicans","category-the-constitution","category-us-house","category-us-senate","category-us-supreme-court","bb-type-bradcast"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12074","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12074"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12074\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12074"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12074"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12074"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=12074"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}