{"id":11597,"date":"2016-02-29T18:23:13","date_gmt":"2016-03-01T02:23:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=11597"},"modified":"2016-02-29T18:22:08","modified_gmt":"2016-03-01T02:22:08","slug":"mag-editor-why-only-sanders-can-prevent-president-trump-bradcast-2292016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=11597","title":{"rendered":"Mag Editor: Why Only Sanders Can Prevent ‘President Trump’: ‘BradCast’ 2\/29\/2016"},"content":{"rendered":"

On today’s BradCast<\/i><\/a> [audio link below<\/i>], we examine the reported results of Hillary Clinton’s huge victory over Bernie Sanders in South Carolina over the weekend: What do they mean? Can the results be “trusted”? Are corporate media such as NY Times<\/i> and Washington Post<\/i> misleading Americans about what the current numbers, including the Democratic Party delegate count, actually suggest?<\/p>\n

Then, I’m joined by Current Affairs<\/i><\/a> magazine editor Nathan J. Robinson<\/b> to discuss his recent feature article<\/a> which makes the case that “unless the Democrats run Sanders, a Trump nomination means a Trump Presidency”.<\/p>\n

Robinson, an attorney, Harvard PhD student and children’s book author<\/a>, offers one of the most persuasive arguments I’ve heard to date regarding the “electability” of Sanders versus Clinton — at least under the presumption that Trump is to be the Republicans’ standard-bearer.<\/p>\n

“The problem with polls is that they are unable to foresee events that will occur in the future that will change the way people think,” Robinson explains about perceived advantages that some see in Clinton’s favor right now. “Things that happen in the campaign change people’s opinions, make them more favorable to one candidate, less favorable to another.”<\/p>\n

The “key point” in Robinson’s calculation: Donald Trump as the GOP nominee. “That is something that the Democrats need to start thinking when they ask all these questions about electability. ‘What’s going to happen? Who is going to be attacked and how?’ They need to be thinking in terms that Donald Trump is likely to be the nominee.”<\/p>\n

While it’s true the Right has been attacking Hillary for years — something that Sanders has yet to face — she has never come under the full withering force of Trump’s particularly aggressive and personal campaign style, argues Robinson, who says he’s not personally a fan of either Clinton or Sanders (or Trump, for that matter.) He details why he believes Clinton stands to be pulled under by Trump’s onslaught, whereas Sanders stands a far greater chance of surviving the type of campaign that Trump has shown himself willing to wage against his Republican opponents.<\/p>\n

We discuss what is likely to happen in both a Trump v. Sanders and Trump v. Clinton race, how Democrats who are focused on the inevitable attacks from the Right against Sanders as a “Socialist!” may be missing a much larger concern, and how all of this calculus completely changes if someone other than Trump somehow manages to win the GOP nomination.<\/p>\n

Finally, the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has already had a profound effect on the Court. On Friday, Dow Chemical dropped<\/a> their planned SCOTUS appeal of a $1 billion judgment against them, citing the “increased…likelihood for unfavorable outcomes for business involved in class action suits.” And, today, Justice Clarence Thomas spoke up<\/a> to ask questions during oral arguments at the Court for the first time in 10 years!…<\/p>\n

CLICK TO LISTEN OR DOWNLOAD SHOW!…<\/a><\/i><\/b>
\n[audio:http:\/\/bradblog.com\/audio\/BradCast_BradFriedman_NathanRobinson_TrumpClintonSanders_SCPrimaryResults_022916.mp3]<\/blockquote>\n

* * *<\/b><\/center>While we post <\/i>The BradCast<\/a> here every day, and you can hear it across all of our great affiliate stations and websites, to automagically get new episodes as soon as they’re available sent right to your computer or personal device, subscribe for free at iTunes<\/a>, Stitcher<\/a>, TuneIn<\/a> or our native RSS feed<\/a>!<\/i><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The BRAD BLOG<\/strong>, The BradCast<\/em> and Green News Report<\/em> are all 100% independent and 100% listener and reader supported!<\/span>Please CLICK HERE to help support our work today!<\/a><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On today’s BradCast [audio link below], we examine the reported results of Hillary Clinton’s huge victory over Bernie Sanders in South Carolina over the weekend: What do they mean? Can the results be “trusted”? Are corporate media such as NY Times and Washington Post misleading Americans about what the current numbers, including the Democratic Party […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[508,494,89,675,469,299,479,420,594,226,477,188,148,300,248,166,313,53],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-11597","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-antonin-scalia","category-bernie-sanders","category-media-appearance","category-bradcast","category-clarence-thomas","category-democrats","category-donald-trump","category-election-2010","category-election-2016","category-hillary-clinton","category-kpfk","category-mainstream-media-failure","category-new-york-times","category-republicans","category-south-carolina","category-touch-screen-vote-hopping","category-us-supreme-court","category-washington-post","bb-type-bradcast"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11597","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11597"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11597\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11597"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11597"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11597"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=11597"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}