{"id":10799,"date":"2014-09-09T07:35:10","date_gmt":"2014-09-09T14:35:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=10799"},"modified":"2014-09-08T22:46:44","modified_gmt":"2014-09-09T05:46:44","slug":"us-senate-votes-to-advance-citizens-united-amendment-but-gop-members-set-to-oppose-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=10799","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Senate Votes to Advance &#8216;Citizens United&#8217; Amendment, But GOP Members Set to Oppose It"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/RandPaul_KochBrothers_NewHampshire_041214.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\">On Monday, the U.S. Senate <a href=\"http:\/\/politics.nytimes.com\/congress\/votes\/113\/senate\/2\/259\">voted<\/a> to move forward with a final vote on a joint resolution to propose an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would overturn the <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=7709\">Supreme Court&#8217;s infamous <i>Citizens United<\/i> decision<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The 79 to 18 vote to end debate and move on to a final vote on the measure included 25 &#8220;yes&#8221; votes from Republicans. However, <i><a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/floor-action\/senate\/217025-senate-advances-constitutional-amendment-on-campaign-spending\">The Hill<\/i> reports<\/a>, many of the GOP Senators are expected to vote against the resolution, &#8220;but by allowing it to proceed [they] ensured that it will tie up the Senate for most of the week.&#8221; The Senate, which just returned from its 5-week summer recess on Monday, is in session for just two weeks before breaking for mid-term elections. A vote on the resolution may help to run out the clock on other Democratic priorities before the next recess.<\/p>\n<p><i>Citizens United<\/i>, as we wrote just after the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s 2010 decision, has &#8220;opened the door to the creation of a new master-class under the aegis of the most undemocratic of institutions &#8212; the private corporation.&#8221;  In fact, it has proven to have opened the floodgates for would be oligarchs, like the self-described &#8220;libertarian&#8221; Koch brothers, to further undermine the very foundation of our representative form of democracy &#8212; a strategy that has resulted in their spending as much as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/politics\/an-expanding-koch-network-aims-to-spend-300-million-to-shape-senate-fight-and-2016\/2014\/06\/18\/d42877ec-f703-11e3-a3a5-42be35962a52_story.html\">$300 million<\/a> to win control of the U.S. Senate for Republicans in the upcoming mid-term elections alone.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We should have debate on this important amendment,&#8221; Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) declared before casting his vote for cloture, in order to end the debate on Monday. &#8220;The majority should be made to answer why they want to silence critics.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>One Republican Senator who voted against cloture, who is apparently not even in favor of allowing the U.S. Senate to vote on the measure, is Kentucky&#8217;s Rand Paul. The similarly &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/news\/united-states\/21614170-libertarian-senator-kentucky-probably-not-republicans-saviour-rand-paul\">self-described libertarian<\/a>&#8221; Paul, who is not up for re-election this year, but is currently a front-runner for the 2016 Republican nomination for President, joined a minority of his GOP colleagues in voting against allowing the proposed amendment to receive an up or down vote. That vote, as well as his <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=7854\">past efforts to shield corporations from democratic and legal accountability<\/a>, underscore once again that the Kentucky Senator and the infamous Koch brothers are cut from the same cloth.<\/p>\n<p>As Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), a co-sponsor of the amendment, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sanders.senate.gov\/newsroom\/press-releases\/senate-poised-to-vote-on-constitutional-amendment-to-undo-citizens-united\">observed<\/a>, the measure entails <i>the<\/i> &#8220;major issue of our time&#8221;: to wit, &#8220;whether the United States of America retains its democratic foundation or whether we devolve into an oligarchic form of society where a handful of billionaires are able to control our political process by spending hundreds of millions of dollars to elect candidates who represent their interest.&#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>If it&#8217;s up to Rand Paul, clearly he favors the latter.<\/p>\n<p>Monday&#8217;s vote is also a reminder that the upcoming 2014 mid-term elections are far more important than ordinary citizens may realize. The long-shot resolution, <a href=\"http:\/\/thomas.loc.gov\/cgi-bin\/query\/z?c113:S.J.RES.19:\">S.J. Res 19<\/a>, would require two-thirds approval in both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives before moving on for ratification as an Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by three-quarters of the state legislatures. Given that extraordinary requirement, those voters who may oppose unlimited &#8220;dark money&#8221; political spending by corporations and billionaires would have to ignore a blizzard of Koch propaganda this year and vote Democratic or independent candidates into control of both chambers of Congress in order for the Amendment to become a reality.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Monday, the U.S. Senate voted to move forward with a final vote on a joint resolution to propose an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would overturn the Supreme Court&#8217;s infamous Citizens United decision. The 79 to 18 vote to end debate and move on to a final vote on the measure included 25 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":107,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[192,494,299,596,490,496,300,126,127,233],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-10799","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-accountability","category-bernie-sanders","category-democrats","category-election-2014","category-koch-industries","category-rand-paul","category-republicans","category-rights-and-freedoms","category-the-constitution","category-us-senate","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10799","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/107"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10799"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10799\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10799"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10799"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10799"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=10799"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}