READER COMMENTS ON
"Conyers at Media Bias Forum: 'Independent Press Under Assault'"
(49 Responses so far...)
COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
...
Bejammin075
said on 5/24/2005 @ 1:04 pm PT...
Only problem with the AAR coverage was that the volume was way way way low whenever the coverage was on. I was listening from a computer at work that has adequate speakers, and with everything turned up up up, I had to stand right on top of the computer to hear anything. Then when Catherin Lanpher would talk, or the commercials would play, it was LOUD AS HELL.
COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
...
Gordon H.
said on 5/24/2005 @ 1:17 pm PT...
You know, Conyers takes the bold steps to push these things up into the light of day. Unfortunately, something has to happen from there to keep them up in the light of day and from disappearing. That probably has to be some driving force from "we the people" to thank him for his bold action and to pick the ball up and throw it even further up and out where the world will see and feel it and also start pushing it as well.
How do we really, effectively do that? A massive write-in campaign for MSM outlets to carry the story? A massive email campaign to the other Congressmen to launch the inquiry? Surely the 6 or 7 intense Bradbloggers can put their heads together and figure out that next step in making something happen!
Onward!
COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
...
Gordon H.
said on 5/24/2005 @ 1:21 pm PT...
Check it out! Yes, "we the people" are speaking! Keep the relentless drive moving!
McClellan Backs Away from Claims that 'Newsweek' Story Cost Afghan Lives
By E&P Staff Published: May 24, 2005 1:10 PM ET
NEW YORK At a White House press briefing Monday, Press Secretary Scott McClellan, pressed by reporters and with Afghan President Karzai in disagreement, retreated on claims that Newsweek's retracted story on Koran abuse cost lives in Afghanistan.
He also claimed that he had never said it did, even though a check of transcripts disputes that. On May 16, for example, he said, "people have lost their lives." On May 17, he said, "People did lose their lives," and, "People lost their lives" due to the Newsweek report.
COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
...
kira
said on 5/24/2005 @ 1:25 pm PT...
Brad --- how did the ad for "Stop Democrat Obstruction" up or down vote dot com get on your site?
COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
...
kira
said on 5/24/2005 @ 1:27 pm PT...
And now it's gone ?? Will it come back?
COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
...
kira
said on 5/24/2005 @ 1:29 pm PT...
Hoohah Gordon H.!!
Way to go E & P!
COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
...
MAXIE
said on 5/24/2005 @ 1:45 pm PT...
This man is something else,we have got to support him with all we have.Yes,the 6 or 7 will come up with something or someway to work on the msm and who knows,maby on the other reps.also.Onward Christian Soldiers!!
COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
...
Robert Lockwood Mills
said on 5/24/2005 @ 1:45 pm PT...
Conyers is a brave and eloquent man. One problem he faces here, though, is that in order to disseminate his critique of the media, he needs the media themselves to help.
We can (partially) fill the gap by spreading his words far and wide. With Bush's ratings so low, the public is more willing to listen now than ever.
COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
...
Nothing Without Hope (at DU)
said on 5/24/2005 @ 1:50 pm PT...
Brad has started a thread on this Forum at Democratic Underground here:
http://tinyurl.com/88vgp
Thread title: "BRAD BLOG: Conyers at Media Bias Forum: 'Independent Press Under Assault'"
I will help to add further reports on the Forum as they come in. Democratic Underground was responsible for many emails and calls to CSPAN to cover this Forum.
I think Mr. Conyers may be pleasantly surprised when he realizes that his army of online truth-tellers is much bigger than he knew - there are so many sites, some large and some smaller, but together they make a vital community that is making a difference.
COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
...
Dredd
said on 5/24/2005 @ 2:11 pm PT...
Rep. Conyers Thank you!
CSPAN thank you too for covering it.
COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
...
MrBlueSky
said on 5/24/2005 @ 2:16 pm PT...
I am sending a message to my local media (once again!)
I am asking them to discuss the Congressional Research Report that Mr. Conyers is releasing today.
I doubt they would do anything about it... but I am hoping against hope that they will.
COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
...
MMIIXX
said on 5/24/2005 @ 3:08 pm PT...
Give me a "J" give me a "O" give me a "H" give me a "N"
COMMENT #13 [Permalink]
...
America's Work Stories
said on 5/24/2005 @ 3:37 pm PT...
COMMENT #14 [Permalink]
...
Peggy
said on 5/24/2005 @ 4:24 pm PT...
I believe that if Mr. Conyers and others, including the internet blogs continue doing what they are doing, the house of cards will fall. Everyone must do whatever they can. The MSM is NOT doing their job. The American people know this. They are waiting for the opportunity to break this ugly regime and the participatory MSM. The opportunity (or several opportunities will come soon). What about the march in Washington DC on July 4th calling for the impeachment of B@#$%&sh? What about an alignment of all the newspapers and tv stations which are NOT afraid to publish the truth about B@#$%&sh? There needs to be a major uniting of like minds.
COMMENT #15 [Permalink]
...
jen
said on 5/24/2005 @ 4:33 pm PT...
My friend on CCN ran across this video - thought you guys may want to watch it. It's a streaming file, 30 mins.
Shocking and Awful: Channels of War: the Media is the Military
The mainstream television networks have fanned the flames of war, and have profited from doing so. This program looks at how the corporate media has sanitized American's field of vision.
View Video Here
COMMENT #16 [Permalink]
...
Dr. Alan H. Levinson
said on 5/24/2005 @ 4:43 pm PT...
Great job as usual by Mr. Conyers. I agree with any number of the above posts that the only way to make any headway into the MSM is to continue to write editorial after editorial. I often sit at the computer, late at night, usually to my wife's dismay, and write as many different topics as I can think of using microsoft word. Then with the magic of cut & paste, send letter after letter to CNN, other tv shows, newspapers across the country. I assume none have ever gotten printed since I've never received a call of confirmation from any of these agencies. However, as I build up a back-log of these editorials, I will continue to send them again and again.
Good luck to all. Please jot down a few sentences and send, send, send!!! The GOP may be amidst their first significan sign of weakening with Frist's failure. Now the embrionic stem cell research has been approved, and will elicit a veto from the president. If lucky, his veto will be over-ridden (as it seems the country wants this research to continue). Once the override is in, then the Fascade will collapse. At some point, the media will begin to grow testicles again (sorry for the metaphor...no insult intended to the females who can be equally as assertive!!)...and suddenly it will be chic to tread upon the president's philosophies and buddies (Delay).
Lots of luck, energy, and where-with-all to everyone. Keep on Truckin'.
Alan
COMMENT #17 [Permalink]
...
kira
said on 5/24/2005 @ 4:59 pm PT...
OT Alert.....
dinsdag, mei 24, 2005
Happy Birthday Bob Dylan!!
Desultory Turgescence
Word of the day (to all our favorite trolls): desultory \DES-uhl-tor-ee\, adjective:
1. Jumping or passing from one thing or subject to another without order or rational connection; disconnected; aimless.
2. By the way; as a digression; not connected with the subject.
3. Coming disconnectedly or occurring haphazardly; random.
4. Disappointing in performance or progress.
And just for fun and the memories:
A Simple Desultory Phillippic (or How I was Robert McNamara'd into Submission)
Simon and Garfunkel
I been Norman Mailered, Maxwell Taylored.
I been John O'Hara'd, McNamara'd.
I been Rolling Stoned and Beatled till I'm blind.
I been Ayn Randed, nearly branded
Communist, 'cause I'm left-handed.
That's the hand I use, well, never mind!
I been Phil Spectored, resurrected.
I been Lou Adlered, Barry Sadlered.
Well, I paid all the dues I want to pay.
And I learned the truth from Lenny Bruce,
And all my wealth won't buy me health,
So I smoke a pint of tea a day.
I knew a man, his brain was so small,
He couldn't think of nothing at all.
He's not the same as you and me.
He doesn't dig poetry. He's so unhip that
When you say Dylan, he thinks you're talking about Dylan Thomas,
Whoever he was.
The man ain't got no culture,
But it's alright, ma,
Everybody must get stoned.
I been Mick Jaggered, silver daggered.
Andy Warhol, won't you please come home?
I been mothered, fathered, aunt and uncled,
Been Roy Haleed and Art Garfunkeled.
I just discovered somebody's tapped my phone.
---------------
COMMENT #18 [Permalink]
...
Grizzly Bear Dancer
said on 5/24/2005 @ 5:10 pm PT...
Once again John Conyers Jr ROCKS!!!
COMMENT #19 [Permalink]
...
Dr. Alan H. Levinson
said on 5/24/2005 @ 5:23 pm PT...
Jen,
Just saw the vid. HOLY COW!! Great job. I listed the site on conyersblog so my buds there can see it.
COMMENT #20 [Permalink]
...
praetorian
said on 5/24/2005 @ 6:06 pm PT...
independent press lol... that's like saying dan rather acted independently... you're a joke, Brad
COMMENT #21 [Permalink]
...
Peg C
said on 5/24/2005 @ 6:22 pm PT...
A wholesale bocott of the MSM, accompanied by a massive letter-writing campaign explaining the boycott might be of some use. It has to be huge, though - and organized. And people would have to follow through. Dangle a few carrots too, such as a deluge of publicity and praise for the first MAJOR newspaper or cable channel to offer full, comprehensive coverage of top stories.
COMMENT #22 [Permalink]
...
Peg C
said on 5/24/2005 @ 6:24 pm PT...
COMMENT #23 [Permalink]
...
Dazy
said on 5/24/2005 @ 6:28 pm PT...
yuk yuk praetorian. The story that was ignored by the MSM that Dan Rather told is that the information in that memo was TRUE! And many times the White House insisted that ALL the military info on Bush was out, and they said it, oh, six seven times as more and more surfaced slowly...
Yet another example of an essential truth completely obliterated by the MSM mantra of "the Dan Rather forged memo" ooohh....
A memo which, by the way, is STILL not authenticated one way or the other. Why is that???????? Are the FBI that bad? c'mon...
COMMENT #24 [Permalink]
...
Hope
said on 5/24/2005 @ 6:56 pm PT...
Please come join the conversation at Conyers blog. Someone linked to the bad boys and they sent out the trolls. Right now there are more of them than us and frankly I think ignoring them in greater numbers would have a better effect. http://www.conyersblog.us/
COMMENT #25 [Permalink]
...
Valley Girl
said on 5/24/2005 @ 7:01 pm PT...
Here is a copy of an email that I just sent to Byron Calame at the NYT. His email address is public@nytimes.com
---------------------------------
Dear Mr. Calame,
I am writing to give you my opinion about the NYT's coverage of issues surrounding the Iraq war, the 2004 election, the Bush administration, and so forth. In a word, dismal. If I have any respect left for the NYT, it is because of the fine Tuesday section on science, and especially the writing of Natalie Angier. I am not a local, so I my comments do not pertain to your local coverage. I have no way to assess this.
Perhaps I am especially disappointed in the NYT because of a particular association. I graduated from Pomona College in 1969, and Bill Keller graduated from same in 1970-- a small liberal arts college with a student body of ~1200. Frankly, I don't remember him, and am equally sure that he doesn't remember me. Nonetheless, I mention this association because we were both surrounded by the same ethos and events-- the VietNam war, Walter Cronkite telling the truth, the draft lottery, Kent State, and, slightly later, the Watergate investigation, led by the Washington Post. Somehow, I had expected that the events of this time frame would have inspired Mr. Keller to push the NYT to a level of involvement and hard investigation worthy of Walter Cronkite, and of the Washington Post during that era.
It may be that Mr. Keller is trying to push the NYT in that direction, but without much success. I noted some recent news articles which reported on a NYT internal inquiry. I cannot remember the exact wording of the comment, but the gist of it was that it is harder to reach a real person at the NYT that at any other US newspaper. True, I would say, given that even the LA Times has a free roster of email addresses of staff, which the NYT certainly lacks.
Perhaps you are taking the tack of distancing yourselves from readers, the further to seem above it all. I can assure that this is a mistake- to be distant and unresponsive (among a few other faults I find with the NYT). I teach college students, and I can also assure you that most of them don't even know that the NYT is the most respected newspaper in the US. Moreover, they aren't likely to discover that any time soon. They read internet sites and internet blogs for news. Sorry to say, I do too, now. Just as the major networks are encountering increasing lack of interest, I fear that the NYT will find the same. There are many references to the main-stream media (MSM) of late, available via the internet, mostly commenting on the lack of their coverage of crucial events. Although this might seem like an annoying drip-drip-drip of a leaky tap for you right now, it's going to turn into a huge gusher sometime in the not-too-distant future, unless you change your course. That's not a threat, rather, an educated prediction, based on my own experience. Thus, the MSM will become the OSM (old stream media).
If you want to check out some recent commentary about the MSM, I suggest you go to https://bradblog.com/archives/00001414.htm, which has the text of John Conyers statement about the press, and includes references to a few of the sites that I normally read, in lieu of the NYT, to find out what's going on in our land.
With regard to your statement, quoted thus: "So Times readers finally have the Washington bureau's take on the Downing Street Memo to go with the alert coverage on the minutes the foreign desk provided back on May 2. Overall, it's better than the readers of most other newspapers got." Overall, it's better than the readers of most other newspapers got... OK, great. At (my university), a D is a passing grade. A D+ is better. I think you got a D+.
Please forward my email to Bill Keller. I wish that I could have attended the recent Pomona College event, where he and others spoke about journalism. I would have had a few hard questions to ask him.
------------------------------
COMMENT #26 [Permalink]
...
Peg C
said on 5/24/2005 @ 7:29 pm PT...
COMMENT #27 [Permalink]
...
kira
said on 5/24/2005 @ 8:22 pm PT...
Thank you Hope #24
Everybody, please help out at John Conyers' site. Come join the fracas.
COMMENT #28 [Permalink]
...
Peggy
said on 5/24/2005 @ 8:41 pm PT...
COMMENT #29 [Permalink]
...
Robert Lockwood Mills
said on 5/25/2005 @ 1:27 am PT...
Valley Girl, there are no words to describe Bill Keller. I still get the Times delivered every day, and can tell you the 2004 election fraud story is still an absolute non-story to them...despite Conyers' 102-page report, despite the 57,000 complaints that were filed in the first 48 hours after the election, regardless of the statistical anomalies and the findings of the college professors.
The first story they ran was about two weeks after the election, but someone named Tom Zeller, Jr. Its focus wasn't on election fraud, but on the efforts of bloggers to spread conspiracy theories. The whole tone was as follows: "The election is over, but a handful of diehards won't admit it. As they spread their conspiracy theories, they are quickly debunked."
That was a front-page story. A week or so later, the Ukraine election fraud story took over the headlines, but nobody at the Times (at least not Bill Keller) paused to consider, "If that election was crooked, is it possible ours was, too?"
Since then, Zeller has seemingly crawled back into his hole, and the Times editorial page has had to admit many voters were disenfranchised (I think they heard from some prominent African American politicians to that effect). But the word "fraud" has yet to appear.
What proves that this is coming from Keller, and not from a collective apathy on the part of Times contributors, is that the editorial columnists have also remained mute on election fraud. Even Maureen Dowd, who takes on anyone, hasn't said a word about it (I've written to her to ask why, and gotten no response). Bob Herbert, as liberal and feisty a columnist as there is, hasn't said a word (and won't respond either). Likewise Paul Krugman, an eloquent liberal and author of "The Great Unraveling," hasn't addressed election fraud once.
It's Keller. It has to be. He's the boss, and the entire Times staff wouldn't stay quiet on their own.
COMMENT #30 [Permalink]
...
MAXIE
said on 5/25/2005 @ 6:45 am PT...
Images of thousands of dead U.S. soldiers helped to turn the tide of public opinion against the Vietnam War, but now photo-journalists are even banned from military funerals at Arlington national cemetery. A report this weekend in the Los Angeles Times documented the extremely rare publication of photos of American casualties in six major newspapers during a sixth month period. Readers of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Los Angeles Times, New York Times, St. Louis Post-Dispatch and Washington Post never saw a single picture of a dead serviceman or servicewoman in their morning papers.Just saw this on Democracy Now!!!
COMMENT #31 [Permalink]
...
molly
said on 5/25/2005 @ 7:06 am PT...
Love that post to N.Y.Times. I don't buy it anymore as a way to protest. Ever thought that they would like to print the news but can't? I don't believe that as many good journalists as there are, that all of them just rolled over. Like ...like when Stalen was doing the mass murder thing, do you think there were a lot of letters to the editor saying we don't approve of murder? Or Hitler? Just think about it. People don't change core values over night.
COMMENT #32 [Permalink]
...
kira
said on 5/25/2005 @ 11:02 am PT...
Excellent letter Valley Girl. Thank you so much for writing the NYT.
COMMENT #33 [Permalink]
...
nakedmanrunning
said on 5/25/2005 @ 5:05 pm PT...
http://www.conyersblog.u...es/00000103.htm#comments
WHOA, our buddy Conyers is taking BIG TIME hits on his resolution to protect the Quran!
Say, why didn't he include the Bible in this? Or the Jewish Holy Books?
I think JC made a big time mistake. This resolution is getting faxed all over Michigan and the PEOPLES IS MAD!!!!
COMMENT #34 [Permalink]
...
kira
said on 5/25/2005 @ 5:44 pm PT...
The Quicktime clips are up on Conyersblog! Rush on over ...
COMMENT #35 [Permalink]
...
River
said on 5/29/2005 @ 6:17 am PT...
Valley Girl, Great letter to NYT!
Btw, I was also in the class of '69 at PC.
Glad to know someone else has not forgotten what we learned 'extra-curricularly' there, as we grappled with lbj, mcnamara, dean rusk, and later nixon and his plumbers. As they say, 'it's deja vu all over again!' as we hear the same bs about the war on terror that we heard about the war in nam. One big difference was the draft - it put butts on the line, and self-interest came into play.
I remember in a politics class there, discussing whether the US could ever become a dictatorship. Most of my classmates thought I was nuts when I said it could --- if we lost freedom of speech. Sadly, most of them probably would still think I'm nuts, if they still read the New York Times. It seems the MSM has lost the freedom of speech.
Be the media!
COMMENT #36 [Permalink]
...
Victoria Carpe
said on 5/29/2005 @ 7:43 am PT...
I watched "Conyers Media Forum" and felt a sense of hope for the first time in many years. I did not think that in our great country that something like a take-over of the media and our country could go on. How could this happen in our country? How come some people can't see this? We have been taken over by the right. Everything that makes our country great is being taken away. We no longer have freedom to speak unless it is what this administration agrees with. Our jobs are being taken away to the lowest bidder, our environment and water is being destroyed as we speak, they are trying to take away Social Security and pensions and they do this under the guise of religion and values.
Bush is supposed to be president of the United States and all the people, yet he does not even want to hear an opposing view. Why is this not news that this president only allows people that agree with him to come to his. Why is this not an outrage.
This man is too stupid to be president.
I never heard of a religion or values that takes from the poor and gives to the rich. And what does the media talk about!!! Michael Jackson, Terry Shivo, Scott Peterson etc.
The administration uses the idea that this president was elected for a second term, so that people must agree with what is being said. I do not think that this president was elected either time - he was selected the first time and the second time there was no paper trail on the voting machines to prove the validity of the vote. Why didn’t the press look into all the irregularities that went on in these elections?
So I thank Mr. Conyers for holding this forum on the media, because we have to have an honest press in order for people to see what is actually happening in their own country. It is very scary.
COMMENT #37 [Permalink]
...
kadamson
said on 5/31/2005 @ 10:54 am PT...
Conyers is yesterday. Mainstream media does not know how it will suvive in the new media. Mainstream media continues to do what it has done since time immemorial - sell advertising. The major networks were better at hiding their bias behind the gauze of unbias than most outlets. The news is a fingertip away and bias selection is a given.
Witness, the participants on this blog commenting on a media forum discussing old media.
It's easy now. Go find the news that suits you rather than waiting to be told what news is important and what you should think about it. You too, Mr. Conyers.
COMMENT #38 [Permalink]
...
Sash
said on 6/1/2005 @ 7:27 am PT...
KADAMSON...You obviously don't get it.
COMMENT #39 [Permalink]
...
blad
said on 7/15/2005 @ 2:33 am PT...
Victoria you asked why Bush doesnt listen ti opposing views,and why he doesnt have people with opposing views in his cabinent,i guess thats because this is a Democracy,,you know the one,the one where the majority rules
as far as Bush being stupid,his grades in Harvard were much higher than Kerrys,thats a fact that just canme out.
victoria how is bush taking away our rights of free speach?
and how is Bush trying to take away social security,when what he is proposing is totaly mandatory,[Conyers didn't give you a very comprehensive talking points]
you said Bush is taking our rights to talk unless itr is in agreement with the administration,please give example
COMMENT #40 [Permalink]
...
blad
said on 7/15/2005 @ 2:36 am PT...
Victoria you asked why Bush doesnt listen ti opposing views,and why he doesnt have people with opposing views in his cabinent,i guess thats because this is a Democracy,,you know the one,the one where the majority rules
as far as Bush being stupid,his grades in Harvard were much higher than Kerrys,thats a fact that just canme out.
victoria how is bush taking away our rights of free speach?
and how is Bush trying to take away social security,when what he is proposing is totaly mandatory,[Conyers didn't give you a very comprehensive talking points]
you said Bush is taking our rights to talk unless itr is in agreement with the administration,please give example
COMMENT #41 [Permalink]
...
blad
said on 7/15/2005 @ 2:38 am PT...
Victoria you asked why Bush doesnt listen ti opposing views,and why he doesnt have people with opposing views in his cabinent,i guess thats because this is a Democracy,,you know the one,the one where the majority rules
as far as Bush being stupid,his grades in Harvard were much higher than Kerrys,thats a fact that just canme out.
victoria how is bush taking away our rights of free speach?
and how is Bush trying to take away social security,when what he is proposing is totaly mandatory,[Conyers didn't give you a very comprehensive talking points]
you said Bush is taking our rights to talk unless itr is in agreement with the administration,please give example
COMMENT #42 [Permalink]
...
blad
said on 7/15/2005 @ 2:38 am PT...
Victoria you asked why Bush doesnt listen ti opposing views,and why he doesnt have people with opposing views in his cabinent,i guess thats because this is a Democracy,,you know the one,the one where the majority rules
as far as Bush being stupid,his grades in Harvard were much higher than Kerrys,thats a fact that just canme out.
victoria how is bush taking away our rights of free speach?
and how is Bush trying to take away social security,when what he is proposing is totaly mandatory,[Conyers didn't give you a very comprehensive talking points]
you said Bush is taking our rights to talk unless itr is in agreement with the administration,please give example
COMMENT #43 [Permalink]
...
blad
said on 7/15/2005 @ 2:41 am PT...
Victoria you asked why Bush doesnt listen ti opposing views,and why he doesnt have people with opposing views in his cabinent,i guess thats because this is a Democracy,,you know the one,the one where the majority rules
as far as Bush being stupid,his grades in Harvard were much higher than Kerrys,thats a fact that just canme out.
victoria how is bush taking away our rights of free speach?
and how is Bush trying to take away social security,when what he is proposing is totaly volentary,[Conyers didn't give you a very comprehensive talking points]
you said Bush is taking our rights to talk unless itr is in agreement with the administration,please give example
COMMENT #44 [Permalink]
...
blad
said on 7/15/2005 @ 2:43 am PT...
Victoria you asked why Bush doesnt listen ti opposing views,and why he doesnt have people with opposing views in his cabinent,i guess thats because this is a Democracy,,you know the one,the one where the majority rules
as far as Bush being stupid,his grades in Harvard were much higher than Kerrys,thats a fact that just canme out.
victoria how is bush taking away our rights of free speach?
and how is Bush trying to take away social security,when what he is proposing is totaly volentary,[Conyers didn't give you a very comprehensive talking points]
you said Bush is taking our rights to talk unless itr is in agreement with the administration,please give example
COMMENT #45 [Permalink]
...
marry
said on 7/15/2005 @ 11:16 am PT...
people please stop your propaganda,everything that does not go your way,there is a conspericy,why you were proved wrong,someone whitewashed this or someone hid the truth about that,you never ever own up to to :you'r just plain wrong.it is like childern in the first grade unwilling to take responsabilty,for what you say or the outcome of a position you have taken,ive heard such absurd statements,with absloutly no verification,on such statement as" Bush had something to do with 9/11",even Conyers,said "Israel had something to with 9/11,and all the Jews were told top stay home on 9/11",you make such terrible statements about people without any validation ,just made up words,made up by the prevayers,of hate,as these people have already tainted you people,with a deep hatred of Bush,to the point you will believe,and repete,anything you hear from a US Senator it is shameful,America has never been so hatefull,as today,and i think we will pay for that soon
COMMENT #46 [Permalink]
...
MON
said on 7/15/2005 @ 1:07 pm PT...
I just saw this advertisement on this blog,this tells it all
It doesn’t get any grosser than this. Your favorite grime bandits come to life with all the snot and vomit you can take when the hilarious cult classic Garbage Pail Kids Movie arrives on DVD.(ADVERTISEMENT ON THIS BLOG)
this shows what kind of people that visit this site,it not only shows Brads opinion of you,but the people who targeted a piticular group imagine ,this should be on a site at Sing Sing or a major prison but it is on a Democratic web site,note the fine language,targated to a certian demographics, i could not say what this advertisement and the Democratic PARTY AND BRAD ,SAY ABOUT THE POTENTIAL READERS OF THIS SITE
COMMENT #47 [Permalink]
...
MON
said on 7/15/2005 @ 1:14 pm PT...
I just saw this advertisement on this blog,this tells it all
It doesn’t get any grosser than this. Your favorite grime bandits come to life with all the snot and vomit you can take when the hilarious cult classic Garbage Pail Kids Movie arrives on DVD.(ADVERTISEMENT ON THIS BLOG)
this shows what kind of people that visit this site,it not only shows Brads opinion of you,but the people who targeted a piticular group imagine ,this should be on a site at Sing Sing or a major prison but it is on a Democratic web site,note the fine language,targated to a certian demographics, i could not say what this advertisement and the Democratic PARTY AND BRAD ,SAY ABOUT THE POTENTIAL READERS OF THIS SITE
COMMENT #48 [Permalink]
...
EOJ
said on 7/15/2005 @ 1:45 pm PT...
Brad,is that you,you'r picture on the top of this page?smoking a JOINT? showing others your criminal tendencys,what will be your next step Brad?..It is still a crime in this country is it not Brad?,smokibng pot no matter how you feel ,is a crime so why should anyone believe anything you say,your disdain for the law is obvious,and was not Bush who made this law Brad,so i guess we can assertain that you,Brad feel you can break the law of this country,and your background of growing up a criminal should allow you to break the law today,
Brad are most Democrats today Pot smokers?it' kind of makes it plain, why you are all against the war on drugs,but i don't understand why you were against the sodomy law's
You guys could always take medication from a Doctor,if it's really that bad,and you will have broken no laws
I did not put it all togather untill i saw your picture,.Your support of giving criminals back their rights,so they can vote ,all the Gang Bangers,Murderers,Pedofiles,Rapist's,good play Brad,and i think you and Mr.Conyers are right,these people will not vote Republican,and will vote Democratic,if i were a criminal i would surely be a Democrat
COMMENT #49 [Permalink]
...
AFFIRM
said on 7/27/2005 @ 9:32 pm PT...
Interestingly enough, I notice absolutely no typos in Victoria's statement. Yet those who would tear her down write with so many it shows an alarming lack of education. Does this mean something? I think it does. Apparently the only supporters of the "right" are corporations and people with a lack of the ability to even spell correctly.